At least two of the hijackers of Air France Flight 139 “two Germans from the German Revolutionary Cells—Wilfried Böse and Brigitte Kuhlmann” have their own articles for their involvement in this affair.
In light of that, how can editors justify not giving this pilot his own article? Notorious is okay but heroic is not?
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
The AFD was authored by the Notorious Nableezy. Perhaps the most aggressive anti-Israel activist ever to edit Wikipedia. He hates Israel and edits Wikipedia to suit his prejudices. His justification for the AFD is “There are no sources about this person outside of ones discussing him in relation to the hijacking and the raid.” He lies. And ignores his responsibility to perform a simple google search before beginning an AFD. His behavior is aggressive, non-colegial and extremely disriptive to the editing process. i.e., he wastes the time of a lot of good editors who have to repair the damage he does.
Q. Why has Nableezy not been blocked?
A. Anti-Israel editors don’t get blocked.
This is so true; anti-Semitism is actually encouraged at Wikipedia! Just take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Israel_Palestine_Collaboration&diff=441436749&oldid=441436610 where the racist administrator Malik Shabazz dismisses the rebuttal of a racist smear against Israel as a “personal attack”—and still leaves Carol Moore’s racist diatribe intact!
What she said wasn’t antisemitic at all. It was true. The Israeli government often bans people from entering the country because the Israeli government does not like their opinions.
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=175714
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=102199
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=124581
http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=228462
http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?ID=228551&R=R1
http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=228512